Correlation Between Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ashford Hospitality Trust and Powerstorm Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ashford Hospitality with a short position of Powerstorm Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings

-0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Ashford and Powerstorm is -0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ashford Hospitality Trust and Powerstorm Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Powerstorm Holdings and Ashford Hospitality is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ashford Hospitality Trust are associated (or correlated) with Powerstorm Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Powerstorm Holdings has no effect on the direction of Ashford Hospitality i.e., Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Ashford Hospitality Trust is expected to under-perform the Powerstorm Holdings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Ashford Hospitality Trust is 2.44 times less risky than Powerstorm Holdings. The stock trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Powerstorm Holdings is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13.00  in Powerstorm Holdings on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (11.70) from holding Powerstorm Holdings or give up 90.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ashford Hospitality Trust  vs.  Powerstorm Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ashford Hospitality Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ashford Hospitality Trust are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively inconsistent technical indicators, Ashford Hospitality may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Powerstorm Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Powerstorm Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ashford Hospitality and Powerstorm Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ashford Hospitality position performs unexpectedly, Powerstorm Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Powerstorm Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Powerstorm Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Ashford Hospitality Trust and Powerstorm Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity