Correlation Between Income Growth and American Century

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Income Growth and American Century at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Income Growth and American Century into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Income Growth Fund and American Century Ultra, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Income Growth and American Century and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Income Growth with a short position of American Century. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Income Growth and American Century.

Diversification Opportunities for Income Growth and American Century

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Income and American is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Income Growth Fund and American Century Ultra in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on American Century Ultra and Income Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Income Growth Fund are associated (or correlated) with American Century. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of American Century Ultra has no effect on the direction of Income Growth i.e., Income Growth and American Century go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Income Growth and American Century

Assuming the 90 days horizon Income Growth is expected to generate 1.4 times less return on investment than American Century. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Income Growth Fund is 1.61 times less risky than American Century. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. American Century Ultra is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  8,413  in American Century Ultra on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,232  from holding American Century Ultra or generate 26.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Income Growth Fund  vs.  American Century Ultra

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Income Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Income Growth Fund are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Income Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
American Century Ultra 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in American Century Ultra are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, American Century may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Income Growth and American Century Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Income Growth and American Century

The main advantage of trading using opposite Income Growth and American Century positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Income Growth position performs unexpectedly, American Century can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in American Century will offset losses from the drop in American Century's long position.
The idea behind Income Growth Fund and American Century Ultra pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals