Correlation Between Income Growth and Ginnie Mae

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Income Growth and Ginnie Mae at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Income Growth and Ginnie Mae into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Income Growth Fund and Ginnie Mae Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Income Growth and Ginnie Mae and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Income Growth with a short position of Ginnie Mae. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Income Growth and Ginnie Mae.

Diversification Opportunities for Income Growth and Ginnie Mae

-0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Income and Ginnie is -0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Income Growth Fund and Ginnie Mae Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ginnie Mae Fund and Income Growth is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Income Growth Fund are associated (or correlated) with Ginnie Mae. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ginnie Mae Fund has no effect on the direction of Income Growth i.e., Income Growth and Ginnie Mae go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Income Growth and Ginnie Mae

Assuming the 90 days horizon Income Growth Fund is expected to generate 2.12 times more return on investment than Ginnie Mae. However, Income Growth is 2.12 times more volatile than Ginnie Mae Fund. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ginnie Mae Fund is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,817  in Income Growth Fund on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  33.00  from holding Income Growth Fund or generate 0.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Income Growth Fund  vs.  Ginnie Mae Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Income Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Income Growth Fund are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Income Growth is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Ginnie Mae Fund 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ginnie Mae Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Ginnie Mae is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Income Growth and Ginnie Mae Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Income Growth and Ginnie Mae

The main advantage of trading using opposite Income Growth and Ginnie Mae positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Income Growth position performs unexpectedly, Ginnie Mae can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ginnie Mae will offset losses from the drop in Ginnie Mae's long position.
The idea behind Income Growth Fund and Ginnie Mae Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas