Correlation Between Bank of America and McDonalds

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank of America and McDonalds at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank of America and McDonalds into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank of America and McDonalds, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank of America and McDonalds and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank of America with a short position of McDonalds. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank of America and McDonalds.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank of America and McDonalds

0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and McDonalds is 0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank of America and McDonalds in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on McDonalds and Bank of America is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank of America are associated (or correlated) with McDonalds. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of McDonalds has no effect on the direction of Bank of America i.e., Bank of America and McDonalds go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank of America and McDonalds

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Bank of America is expected to under-perform the McDonalds. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank of America is 1.42 times less risky than McDonalds. The stock trades about -0.31 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The McDonalds is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  29,309  in McDonalds on November 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,448  from holding McDonalds or generate 4.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Bank of America  vs.  McDonalds

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Bank of America 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Bank of America has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unsteady performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
McDonalds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in McDonalds are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound fundamental indicators, McDonalds is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Bank of America and McDonalds Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Bank of America and McDonalds

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank of America and McDonalds positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank of America position performs unexpectedly, McDonalds can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in McDonalds will offset losses from the drop in McDonalds' long position.
The idea behind Bank of America and McDonalds pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device