Correlation Between Citigroup and DDD
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and DDD at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and DDD into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and DDD, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and DDD and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of DDD. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and DDD.
Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and DDD
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and DDD is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and DDD in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on DDD and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with DDD. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of DDD has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and DDD go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Citigroup and DDD
Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.21 times more return on investment than DDD. However, Citigroup is 4.84 times less risky than DDD. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. DDD is currently generating about -0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,733 in Citigroup on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2,251 from holding Citigroup or generate 47.56% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 54.95% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Citigroup vs. DDD
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Citigroup |
| DDD |
Citigroup and DDD Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Citigroup and DDD
The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and DDD positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, DDD can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in DDD will offset losses from the drop in DDD's long position.| Citigroup vs. Nu Holdings | Citigroup vs. HSBC Holdings PLC | Citigroup vs. Bank of Montreal | Citigroup vs. Bank of Nova |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.
Other Complementary Tools
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope |