Correlation Between Citigroup and Full House

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Full House at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Full House into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Full House Resorts, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Full House and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Full House. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Full House.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Full House

-0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Full is -0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Full House Resorts in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Full House Resorts and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Full House. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Full House Resorts has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Full House go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Full House

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than Full House. However, Citigroup is 2.04 times less risky than Full House. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Full House Resorts is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,117  in Citigroup on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,958  from holding Citigroup or generate 71.85% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Full House Resorts

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Full House Resorts 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Full House Resorts are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent essential indicators, Full House is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Citigroup and Full House Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Full House

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Full House positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Full House can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Full House will offset losses from the drop in Full House's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Full House Resorts pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance