Correlation Between Citigroup and Plum Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Citigroup and Plum Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Citigroup and Plum Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Citigroup and Plum Acquisition I, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Citigroup and Plum Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Citigroup with a short position of Plum Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Citigroup and Plum Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for Citigroup and Plum Acquisition

-0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Citigroup and Plum is -0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Citigroup and Plum Acquisition I in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Plum Acquisition I and Citigroup is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Citigroup are associated (or correlated) with Plum Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Plum Acquisition I has no effect on the direction of Citigroup i.e., Citigroup and Plum Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Citigroup and Plum Acquisition

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Citigroup is expected to generate 0.47 times more return on investment than Plum Acquisition. However, Citigroup is 2.11 times less risky than Plum Acquisition. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Plum Acquisition I is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,553  in Citigroup on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,431  from holding Citigroup or generate 53.39% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy80.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Citigroup  vs.  Plum Acquisition I

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Citigroup 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Citigroup are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady fundamental indicators, Citigroup exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Plum Acquisition I 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Over the last 90 days Plum Acquisition I has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively uncertain forward indicators, Plum Acquisition may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Citigroup and Plum Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Citigroup and Plum Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite Citigroup and Plum Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Citigroup position performs unexpectedly, Plum Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Plum Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Plum Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind Citigroup and Plum Acquisition I pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance