Correlation Between China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between China Infrastructure Construction and 1933 Industries, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in China Infrastructure with a short position of 1933 Industries. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries.
Diversification Opportunities for China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries
0.22 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between China and 1933 is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding China Infrastructure Construct and 1933 Industries in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on China Infrastructure Construction are associated (or correlated) with 1933 Industries. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of 1933 Industries has no effect on the direction of China Infrastructure i.e., China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries
Given the investment horizon of 90 days China Infrastructure is expected to generate 6.13 times less return on investment than 1933 Industries. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, China Infrastructure Construction is 1.14 times less risky than 1933 Industries. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. 1933 Industries is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1.40 in 1933 Industries on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.02) from holding 1933 Industries or give up 72.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Very Weak |
| Accuracy | 31.99% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
China Infrastructure Construct vs. 1933 Industries
Performance |
| Timeline |
| China Infrastructure |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
| 1933 Industries |
China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries
The main advantage of trading using opposite China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if China Infrastructure position performs unexpectedly, 1933 Industries can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 1933 Industries will offset losses from the drop in 1933 Industries' long position.| China Infrastructure vs. Medicine Man Technologies | China Infrastructure vs. Kona Gold Solutions | China Infrastructure vs. Green Thumb Industries | China Infrastructure vs. Cann American Corp |
| 1933 Industries vs. Integrated Cannabis Solutions | 1933 Industries vs. Cannabis Global | 1933 Industries vs. HempAmericana | 1933 Industries vs. Hempfusion Wellness |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.
Other Complementary Tools
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios |