Correlation Between Caesarstone and Montana Technologies

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Caesarstone and Montana Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Caesarstone and Montana Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Caesarstone and Montana Technologies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Caesarstone and Montana Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Caesarstone with a short position of Montana Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Caesarstone and Montana Technologies.

Diversification Opportunities for Caesarstone and Montana Technologies

-0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Caesarstone and Montana is -0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Caesarstone and Montana Technologies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Montana Technologies and Caesarstone is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Caesarstone are associated (or correlated) with Montana Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Montana Technologies has no effect on the direction of Caesarstone i.e., Caesarstone and Montana Technologies go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Caesarstone and Montana Technologies

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Caesarstone is expected to under-perform the Montana Technologies. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Caesarstone is 1.27 times less risky than Montana Technologies. The stock trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Montana Technologies is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  580.00  in Montana Technologies on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  241.00  from holding Montana Technologies or generate 41.55% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy97.73%
ValuesDaily Returns

Caesarstone  vs.  Montana Technologies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Caesarstone 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Caesarstone has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest conflicting performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.
Montana Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Montana Technologies are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively conflicting basic indicators, Montana Technologies revealed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Caesarstone and Montana Technologies Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Caesarstone and Montana Technologies

The main advantage of trading using opposite Caesarstone and Montana Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Caesarstone position performs unexpectedly, Montana Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Montana Technologies will offset losses from the drop in Montana Technologies' long position.
The idea behind Caesarstone and Montana Technologies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal