Correlation Between MFS Investment and Stone Harbor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MFS Investment and Stone Harbor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MFS Investment and Stone Harbor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MFS Investment Grade and Stone Harbor Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MFS Investment and Stone Harbor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MFS Investment with a short position of Stone Harbor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MFS Investment and Stone Harbor.

Diversification Opportunities for MFS Investment and Stone Harbor

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between MFS and Stone is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MFS Investment Grade and Stone Harbor Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stone Harbor Emerging and MFS Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MFS Investment Grade are associated (or correlated) with Stone Harbor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stone Harbor Emerging has no effect on the direction of MFS Investment i.e., MFS Investment and Stone Harbor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MFS Investment and Stone Harbor

Considering the 90-day investment horizon MFS Investment is expected to generate 2.87 times less return on investment than Stone Harbor. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, MFS Investment Grade is 2.63 times less risky than Stone Harbor. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stone Harbor Emerging is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  504.00  in Stone Harbor Emerging on November 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  43.00  from holding Stone Harbor Emerging or generate 8.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy22.72%
ValuesDaily Returns

MFS Investment Grade  vs.  Stone Harbor Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MFS Investment Grade 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days MFS Investment Grade has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, MFS Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Stone Harbor Emerging has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite fairly strong fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

MFS Investment and Stone Harbor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MFS Investment and Stone Harbor

The main advantage of trading using opposite MFS Investment and Stone Harbor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MFS Investment position performs unexpectedly, Stone Harbor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stone Harbor will offset losses from the drop in Stone Harbor's long position.
The idea behind MFS Investment Grade and Stone Harbor Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas