Correlation Between Economic Investment and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Economic Investment and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Economic Investment and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Economic Investment Trust and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Economic Investment and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Economic Investment with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Economic Investment and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Economic Investment and Maple Leaf

0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Economic and Maple is 0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Economic Investment Trust and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Economic Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Economic Investment Trust are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Economic Investment i.e., Economic Investment and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Economic Investment and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Economic Investment is expected to generate 1.61 times less return on investment than Maple Leaf. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Economic Investment Trust is 3.17 times less risky than Maple Leaf. It trades about 0.41 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,146  in Maple Leaf Foods on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  188.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 8.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Economic Investment Trust  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Economic Investment Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Economic Investment Trust are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Economic Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Economic Investment and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Economic Investment and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Economic Investment and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Economic Investment position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Economic Investment Trust and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets