Correlation Between Marblegate Acquisition and GMS

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Marblegate Acquisition and GMS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Marblegate Acquisition and GMS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Marblegate Acquisition Corp and GMS Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Marblegate Acquisition and GMS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Marblegate Acquisition with a short position of GMS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Marblegate Acquisition and GMS.

Diversification Opportunities for Marblegate Acquisition and GMS

0.55
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Marblegate and GMS is 0.55. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Marblegate Acquisition Corp and GMS Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GMS Inc and Marblegate Acquisition is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Marblegate Acquisition Corp are associated (or correlated) with GMS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GMS Inc has no effect on the direction of Marblegate Acquisition i.e., Marblegate Acquisition and GMS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Marblegate Acquisition and GMS

Assuming the 90 days horizon Marblegate Acquisition is expected to generate 9.98 times less return on investment than GMS. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Marblegate Acquisition Corp is 2.48 times less risky than GMS. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GMS Inc is currently generating about 0.27 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,203  in GMS Inc on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  967.00  from holding GMS Inc or generate 10.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Marblegate Acquisition Corp  vs.  GMS Inc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Marblegate Acquisition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Marblegate Acquisition Corp are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Marblegate Acquisition is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
GMS Inc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in GMS Inc are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak primary indicators, GMS may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Marblegate Acquisition and GMS Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Marblegate Acquisition and GMS

The main advantage of trading using opposite Marblegate Acquisition and GMS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Marblegate Acquisition position performs unexpectedly, GMS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GMS will offset losses from the drop in GMS's long position.
The idea behind Marblegate Acquisition Corp and GMS Inc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume