Correlation Between Games Workshop and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Games Workshop and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Games Workshop and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Games Workshop Group and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Games Workshop and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Games Workshop with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Games Workshop and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Games Workshop and Litigation Capital

-0.57
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Games and Litigation is -0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Games Workshop Group and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Games Workshop is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Games Workshop Group are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Games Workshop i.e., Games Workshop and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Games Workshop and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Games Workshop Group is expected to generate 0.77 times more return on investment than Litigation Capital. However, Games Workshop Group is 1.3 times less risky than Litigation Capital. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about -0.29 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,308,632  in Games Workshop Group on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  147,368  from holding Games Workshop Group or generate 11.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Games Workshop Group  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Games Workshop Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Games Workshop Group are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Games Workshop exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.

Games Workshop and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Games Workshop and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Games Workshop and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Games Workshop position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Games Workshop Group and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios