Correlation Between Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Glacier Bancorp with a short position of BOK Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial

0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Glacier and BOK is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BOK Financial and Glacier Bancorp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Glacier Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with BOK Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BOK Financial has no effect on the direction of Glacier Bancorp i.e., Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Glacier Bancorp is expected to generate 1.05 times more return on investment than BOK Financial. However, Glacier Bancorp is 1.05 times more volatile than BOK Financial. It trades about 0.29 of its potential returns per unit of risk. BOK Financial is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,713  in Glacier Bancorp on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  996.00  from holding Glacier Bancorp or generate 21.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Glacier Bancorp  vs.  BOK Financial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Glacier Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Glacier Bancorp are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly fragile fundamental indicators, Glacier Bancorp demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
BOK Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in BOK Financial are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unfluctuating forward-looking signals, BOK Financial may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Glacier Bancorp position performs unexpectedly, BOK Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BOK Financial will offset losses from the drop in BOK Financial's long position.
The idea behind Glacier Bancorp and BOK Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios