Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs High and Sierra Tactical Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Sierra Tactical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical

0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Sierra is 0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs High and Sierra Tactical Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sierra Tactical Municipal and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs High are associated (or correlated) with Sierra Tactical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sierra Tactical Municipal has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 1.2 times less return on investment than Sierra Tactical. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 1.09 times more volatile than Sierra Tactical Municipal. It trades about 0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Sierra Tactical Municipal is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,549  in Sierra Tactical Municipal on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  20.00  from holding Sierra Tactical Municipal or generate 0.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs High  vs.  Sierra Tactical Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs High 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs High are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Sierra Tactical Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sierra Tactical Municipal has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Sierra Tactical is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Sierra Tactical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Sierra Tactical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sierra Tactical will offset losses from the drop in Sierra Tactical's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs High and Sierra Tactical Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume