Correlation Between GM and Centre Testing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Centre Testing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Centre Testing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Centre Testing Intl, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Centre Testing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Centre Testing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Centre Testing.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Centre Testing

-0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Centre is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Centre Testing Intl in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Centre Testing Intl and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Centre Testing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Centre Testing Intl has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Centre Testing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Centre Testing

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.83 times more return on investment than Centre Testing. However, General Motors is 1.21 times less risky than Centre Testing. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Centre Testing Intl is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,285  in General Motors on January 10, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,289  from holding General Motors or generate 39.24% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy96.15%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Centre Testing Intl

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days General Motors has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy primary indicators, GM is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Centre Testing Intl 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Centre Testing Intl are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Centre Testing is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

GM and Centre Testing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Centre Testing

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Centre Testing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Centre Testing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Centre Testing will offset losses from the drop in Centre Testing's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Centre Testing Intl pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world