Correlation Between GM and Core Scientific,

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Core Scientific, at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Core Scientific, into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Core Scientific, Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Core Scientific, and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Core Scientific,. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Core Scientific,.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Core Scientific,

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Core is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Core Scientific, Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Core Scientific, Common and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Core Scientific,. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Core Scientific, Common has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Core Scientific, go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Core Scientific,

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 55.47 times less return on investment than Core Scientific,. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 29.76 times less risky than Core Scientific,. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Core Scientific, Common is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  14.00  in Core Scientific, Common on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,757  from holding Core Scientific, Common or generate 12550.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy54.14%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Core Scientific, Common

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Core Scientific, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Core Scientific, Common are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly uncertain basic indicators, Core Scientific, showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Core Scientific, Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Core Scientific,

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Core Scientific, positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Core Scientific, can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Core Scientific, will offset losses from the drop in Core Scientific,'s long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Core Scientific, Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets