Correlation Between GM and Charles River
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Charles River at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Charles River into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Charles River Laboratories, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Charles River and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Charles River. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Charles River.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Charles River
0.11 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Charles is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Charles River Laboratories in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Charles River Labora and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Charles River. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Charles River Labora has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Charles River go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Charles River
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 1.01 times less return on investment than Charles River. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 2.26 times less risky than Charles River. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Charles River Laboratories is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 18,663 in Charles River Laboratories on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 756.00 from holding Charles River Laboratories or generate 4.05% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Charles River Laboratories
Performance |
| Timeline |
| General Motors |
| Charles River Labora |
GM and Charles River Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Charles River
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Charles River positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Charles River can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Charles River will offset losses from the drop in Charles River's long position.The idea behind General Motors and Charles River Laboratories pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| Charles River vs. ICON PLC | Charles River vs. Mettler Toledo International | Charles River vs. Laboratory of | Charles River vs. Waters |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Other Complementary Tools
| CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account |