Correlation Between GM and Fidelity Disruptive

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Fidelity Disruptive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Fidelity Disruptive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Fidelity Disruptive Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Fidelity Disruptive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Fidelity Disruptive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Fidelity Disruptive.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Fidelity Disruptive

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Fidelity is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Fidelity Disruptive Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Disruptive and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Disruptive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Disruptive has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Fidelity Disruptive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Fidelity Disruptive

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 2.6 times more return on investment than Fidelity Disruptive. However, GM is 2.6 times more volatile than Fidelity Disruptive Technology. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Disruptive Technology is currently generating about 0.29 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,076  in General Motors on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  483.00  from holding General Motors or generate 9.52% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Fidelity Disruptive Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Fidelity Disruptive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Disruptive Technology are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly conflicting basic indicators, Fidelity Disruptive showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Fidelity Disruptive Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Fidelity Disruptive

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Fidelity Disruptive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Disruptive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Disruptive will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Disruptive's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Fidelity Disruptive Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments