Correlation Between GM and Fortress Transp

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Fortress Transp at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Fortress Transp into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Fortress Transp Infra, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Fortress Transp and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Fortress Transp. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Fortress Transp.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Fortress Transp

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Fortress is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Fortress Transp Infra in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fortress Transp Infra and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Fortress Transp. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fortress Transp Infra has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Fortress Transp go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Fortress Transp

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.83 times more return on investment than Fortress Transp. However, General Motors is 1.21 times less risky than Fortress Transp. It trades about -0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fortress Transp Infra is currently generating about -0.32 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,612  in General Motors on September 18, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (497.00) from holding General Motors or give up 8.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Fortress Transp Infra

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Fortress Transp Infra 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fortress Transp Infra are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, Fortress Transp is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

GM and Fortress Transp Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Fortress Transp

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Fortress Transp positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Fortress Transp can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fortress Transp will offset losses from the drop in Fortress Transp's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Fortress Transp Infra pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world