Correlation Between GM and Fortress Transportation

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Fortress Transportation at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Fortress Transportation into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Fortress Transportation and, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Fortress Transportation and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Fortress Transportation. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Fortress Transportation.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Fortress Transportation

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Fortress is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Fortress Transportation and in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fortress Transportation and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Fortress Transportation. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fortress Transportation has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Fortress Transportation go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Fortress Transportation

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 5.85 times more return on investment than Fortress Transportation. However, GM is 5.85 times more volatile than Fortress Transportation and. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fortress Transportation and is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,858  in General Motors on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,990  from holding General Motors or generate 104.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy94.4%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Fortress Transportation and

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Fortress Transportation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Over the last 90 days Fortress Transportation and has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable forward indicators, Fortress Transportation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

GM and Fortress Transportation Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Fortress Transportation

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Fortress Transportation positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Fortress Transportation can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fortress Transportation will offset losses from the drop in Fortress Transportation's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Fortress Transportation and pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device