Correlation Between GM and Greentown China
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Greentown China at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Greentown China into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Greentown China Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Greentown China and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Greentown China. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Greentown China.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Greentown China
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between GM and Greentown is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Greentown China Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Greentown China Holdings and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Greentown China. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Greentown China Holdings has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Greentown China go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Greentown China
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 1.75 times less return on investment than Greentown China. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 2.16 times less risky than Greentown China. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Greentown China Holdings is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 75.00 in Greentown China Holdings on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 21.00 from holding Greentown China Holdings or generate 28.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 56.16% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Greentown China Holdings
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Greentown China Holdings |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
GM and Greentown China Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Greentown China
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Greentown China positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Greentown China can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Greentown China will offset losses from the drop in Greentown China's long position.The idea behind General Motors and Greentown China Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Greentown China vs. Willamette Valley Vineyards | Greentown China vs. SNDL Inc | Greentown China vs. Vita Coco | Greentown China vs. PepsiCo |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Other Complementary Tools
Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities |