Correlation Between GM and Holding Burstil

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Holding Burstil at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Holding Burstil into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Holding Burstil Regional, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Holding Burstil and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Holding Burstil. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Holding Burstil.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Holding Burstil

0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Holding is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Holding Burstil Regional in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Holding Burstil Regional and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Holding Burstil. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Holding Burstil Regional has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Holding Burstil go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Holding Burstil

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to under-perform the Holding Burstil. In addition to that, GM is 4.88 times more volatile than Holding Burstil Regional. It trades about -0.15 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Holding Burstil Regional is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  390,000  in Holding Burstil Regional on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (5,510) from holding Holding Burstil Regional or give up 1.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Holding Burstil Regional

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Holding Burstil Regional 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Holding Burstil Regional are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Holding Burstil may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

GM and Holding Burstil Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Holding Burstil

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Holding Burstil positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Holding Burstil can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Holding Burstil will offset losses from the drop in Holding Burstil's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Holding Burstil Regional pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bonds Directory module to find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data