Correlation Between GM and Oculus VisionTech

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Oculus VisionTech at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Oculus VisionTech into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Oculus VisionTech, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Oculus VisionTech and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Oculus VisionTech. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Oculus VisionTech.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Oculus VisionTech

0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between GM and Oculus is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Oculus VisionTech in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oculus VisionTech and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Oculus VisionTech. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oculus VisionTech has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Oculus VisionTech go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Oculus VisionTech

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon GM is expected to generate 10.12 times less return on investment than Oculus VisionTech. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, General Motors is 8.77 times less risky than Oculus VisionTech. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Oculus VisionTech is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5.00  in Oculus VisionTech on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.08) from holding Oculus VisionTech or give up 1.6% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Oculus VisionTech

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Oculus VisionTech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Oculus VisionTech are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly abnormal basic indicators, Oculus VisionTech showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GM and Oculus VisionTech Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Oculus VisionTech

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Oculus VisionTech positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Oculus VisionTech can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oculus VisionTech will offset losses from the drop in Oculus VisionTech's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Oculus VisionTech pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites