Correlation Between GM and Reading International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Reading International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Reading International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Reading International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Reading International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Reading International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Reading International.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Reading International

-0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between GM and Reading is -0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Reading International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Reading International and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Reading International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Reading International has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Reading International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Reading International

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 0.54 times more return on investment than Reading International. However, General Motors is 1.85 times less risky than Reading International. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Reading International is currently generating about 0.0 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,319  in General Motors on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,701  from holding General Motors or generate 39.38% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Reading International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Reading International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Reading International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain strong and the recent confusion on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-lasting gains for the firm traders.

GM and Reading International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Reading International

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Reading International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Reading International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Reading International will offset losses from the drop in Reading International's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Reading International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios