Correlation Between GM and Conservative Balanced
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Conservative Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Conservative Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Conservative Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Conservative Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Conservative Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Conservative Balanced.
Diversification Opportunities for GM and Conservative Balanced
0.56 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between GM and Conservative is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Conservative Balanced Allocati in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Conservative Balanced and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Conservative Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Conservative Balanced has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Conservative Balanced go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between GM and Conservative Balanced
Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 7.03 times more return on investment than Conservative Balanced. However, GM is 7.03 times more volatile than Conservative Balanced Allocation. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Conservative Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,935 in General Motors on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 544.00 from holding General Motors or generate 11.02% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
General Motors vs. Conservative Balanced Allocati
Performance |
Timeline |
General Motors |
Conservative Balanced |
GM and Conservative Balanced Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with GM and Conservative Balanced
The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Conservative Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Conservative Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Conservative Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Conservative Balanced's long position.The idea behind General Motors and Conservative Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Conservative Balanced vs. Cb Large Cap | Conservative Balanced vs. Qs Large Cap | Conservative Balanced vs. Qs Large Cap | Conservative Balanced vs. Qs Large Cap |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.
Other Complementary Tools
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Equity Analysis Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies |