Correlation Between Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Granite Construction Incorporated and Limbach Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Granite Construction with a short position of Limbach Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings.
Diversification Opportunities for Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings
0.7 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Granite and Limbach is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Granite Construction Incorpora and Limbach Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Limbach Holdings and Granite Construction is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Granite Construction Incorporated are associated (or correlated) with Limbach Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Limbach Holdings has no effect on the direction of Granite Construction i.e., Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Granite Construction is expected to generate 2.75 times less return on investment than Limbach Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Granite Construction Incorporated is 2.11 times less risky than Limbach Holdings. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Limbach Holdings is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,257 in Limbach Holdings on November 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 7,991 from holding Limbach Holdings or generate 635.72% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Granite Construction Incorpora vs. Limbach Holdings
Performance |
Timeline |
Granite Construction |
Limbach Holdings |
Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings
The main advantage of trading using opposite Granite Construction and Limbach Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Granite Construction position performs unexpectedly, Limbach Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Limbach Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Limbach Holdings' long position.Granite Construction vs. EMCOR Group | Granite Construction vs. Comfort Systems USA | Granite Construction vs. Primoris Services | Granite Construction vs. Construction Partners |
Limbach Holdings vs. MYR Group | Limbach Holdings vs. Granite Construction Incorporated | Limbach Holdings vs. Construction Partners | Limbach Holdings vs. Great Lakes Dredge |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Price Ceiling Movement Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments |