Correlation Between Hilton Food and Litigation Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hilton Food and Litigation Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hilton Food and Litigation Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hilton Food Group and Litigation Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hilton Food and Litigation Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hilton Food with a short position of Litigation Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hilton Food and Litigation Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Hilton Food and Litigation Capital

0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hilton and Litigation is 0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hilton Food Group and Litigation Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Litigation Capital and Hilton Food is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hilton Food Group are associated (or correlated) with Litigation Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Litigation Capital has no effect on the direction of Hilton Food i.e., Hilton Food and Litigation Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hilton Food and Litigation Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Hilton Food Group is expected to under-perform the Litigation Capital. In addition to that, Hilton Food is 1.53 times more volatile than Litigation Capital Management. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Litigation Capital Management is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  11,200  in Litigation Capital Management on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  375.00  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 3.35% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hilton Food Group  vs.  Litigation Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hilton Food Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hilton Food Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Hilton Food is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Hilton Food and Litigation Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hilton Food and Litigation Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hilton Food and Litigation Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hilton Food position performs unexpectedly, Litigation Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Litigation Capital will offset losses from the drop in Litigation Capital's long position.
The idea behind Hilton Food Group and Litigation Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world