Correlation Between Kulicke and GLENLN
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kulicke and Soffa and GLENLN 1625 27 APR 26, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kulicke and GLENLN and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kulicke with a short position of GLENLN. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kulicke and GLENLN.
Diversification Opportunities for Kulicke and GLENLN
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Kulicke and GLENLN is -0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kulicke and Soffa and GLENLN 1625 27 APR 26 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GLENLN 1625 27 and Kulicke is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kulicke and Soffa are associated (or correlated) with GLENLN. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GLENLN 1625 27 has no effect on the direction of Kulicke i.e., Kulicke and GLENLN go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Kulicke and GLENLN
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Kulicke and Soffa is expected to generate 3.71 times more return on investment than GLENLN. However, Kulicke is 3.71 times more volatile than GLENLN 1625 27 APR 26. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GLENLN 1625 27 APR 26 is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest 5,019 in Kulicke and Soffa on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (71.00) from holding Kulicke and Soffa or give up 1.41% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 66.17% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Kulicke and Soffa vs. GLENLN 1625 27 APR 26
Performance |
Timeline |
Kulicke and Soffa |
GLENLN 1625 27 |
Kulicke and GLENLN Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Kulicke and GLENLN
The main advantage of trading using opposite Kulicke and GLENLN positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kulicke position performs unexpectedly, GLENLN can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GLENLN will offset losses from the drop in GLENLN's long position.Kulicke vs. Ultra Clean Holdings | Kulicke vs. Ichor Holdings | Kulicke vs. Entegris | Kulicke vs. Amtech Systems |
GLENLN vs. SFL Corporation | GLENLN vs. Sabre Corpo | GLENLN vs. RBC Bearings Incorporated | GLENLN vs. Supercom |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.
Other Complementary Tools
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
Headlines Timeline Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity |