Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Ross Stores

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Ross Stores at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Ross Stores into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Ross Stores, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Ross Stores and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Ross Stores. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Ross Stores.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Ross Stores

-0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Ross is -0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Ross Stores in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ross Stores and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Ross Stores. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ross Stores has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Ross Stores go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Ross Stores

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 1.84 times more return on investment than Ross Stores. However, Litigation Capital is 1.84 times more volatile than Ross Stores. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ross Stores is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  10,073  in Litigation Capital Management on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,502  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 14.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Ross Stores

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Ross Stores 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Ross Stores has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Ross Stores is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Litigation Capital and Ross Stores Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Ross Stores

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Ross Stores positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Ross Stores can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ross Stores will offset losses from the drop in Ross Stores' long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Ross Stores pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets