Correlation Between Litigation Capital and State Bank

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and State Bank at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and State Bank into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and State Bank of, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and State Bank and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of State Bank. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and State Bank.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and State Bank

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and State is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and State Bank of in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on State Bank and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with State Bank. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of State Bank has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and State Bank go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and State Bank

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital is expected to generate 2.69 times less return on investment than State Bank. In addition to that, Litigation Capital is 1.08 times more volatile than State Bank of. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. State Bank of is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  9,423  in State Bank of on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  547.00  from holding State Bank of or generate 5.8% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  State Bank of

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
State Bank 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in State Bank of are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, State Bank is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Litigation Capital and State Bank Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and State Bank

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and State Bank positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, State Bank can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in State Bank will offset losses from the drop in State Bank's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and State Bank of pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators