Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Zanaga Iron Ore, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Zanaga Iron. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron

-0.87
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Zanaga is -0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Zanaga Iron Ore in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zanaga Iron Ore and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Zanaga Iron. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zanaga Iron Ore has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 0.61 times more return on investment than Zanaga Iron. However, Litigation Capital Management is 1.63 times less risky than Zanaga Iron. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zanaga Iron Ore is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  10,073  in Litigation Capital Management on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,502  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 14.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Zanaga Iron Ore

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Zanaga Iron Ore 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Zanaga Iron Ore has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Zanaga Iron positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Zanaga Iron can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zanaga Iron will offset losses from the drop in Zanaga Iron's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Zanaga Iron Ore pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon