Correlation Between Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lottery, Warrants with a short position of Canterbury Park. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park.

Diversification Opportunities for Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park

-0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lottery, and Canterbury is -0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Canterbury Park Holding and Lottery, Warrants is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lottery, Warrants are associated (or correlated) with Canterbury Park. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Canterbury Park Holding has no effect on the direction of Lottery, Warrants i.e., Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park

Assuming the 90 days horizon Lottery, Warrants is expected to generate 4.82 times less return on investment than Canterbury Park. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Lottery, Warrants is 4.48 times less risky than Canterbury Park. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Canterbury Park Holding is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,363  in Canterbury Park Holding on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (268.00) from holding Canterbury Park Holding or give up 11.34% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.59%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lottery, Warrants  vs.  Canterbury Park Holding

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lottery, Warrants 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lottery, Warrants are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly unsteady basic indicators, Lottery, Warrants showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Canterbury Park Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Canterbury Park Holding are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather weak technical indicators, Canterbury Park may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lottery, Warrants position performs unexpectedly, Canterbury Park can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Canterbury Park will offset losses from the drop in Canterbury Park's long position.
The idea behind Lottery, Warrants and Canterbury Park Holding pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio