Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and Arizona Metals Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Arizona Metals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Arizona is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and Arizona Metals Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Arizona Metals Corp and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Arizona Metals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Arizona Metals Corp has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf Foods is expected to generate 0.45 times more return on investment than Arizona Metals. However, Maple Leaf Foods is 2.24 times less risky than Arizona Metals. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Arizona Metals Corp is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,528  in Maple Leaf Foods on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (253.00) from holding Maple Leaf Foods or give up 10.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  Arizona Metals Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Arizona Metals Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Arizona Metals Corp are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Arizona Metals is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Arizona Metals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Arizona Metals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Arizona Metals will offset losses from the drop in Arizona Metals' long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and Arizona Metals Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities