Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and Financial 15 Split, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Financial

0.35
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Financial is 0.35. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and Financial 15 Split in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Financial 15 Split and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Financial 15 Split has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf Foods is expected to under-perform the Financial. In addition to that, Maple Leaf is 6.44 times more volatile than Financial 15 Split. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Financial 15 Split is currently generating about 0.22 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  836.00  in Financial 15 Split on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  229.00  from holding Financial 15 Split or generate 27.39% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  Financial 15 Split

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Financial 15 Split 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

23 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial 15 Split are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Financial is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Maple Leaf and Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Financial will offset losses from the drop in Financial's long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and Financial 15 Split pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.