Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and Verizon Communications CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Verizon Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications

-0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Verizon is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and Verizon Communications CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Verizon Communications and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Verizon Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Verizon Communications has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf is expected to generate 2.83 times less return on investment than Verizon Communications. In addition to that, Maple Leaf is 1.32 times more volatile than Verizon Communications CDR. It trades about 0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Verizon Communications CDR is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,457  in Verizon Communications CDR on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  467.00  from holding Verizon Communications CDR or generate 32.05% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  Verizon Communications CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Verizon Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Verizon Communications CDR are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unsteady basic indicators, Verizon Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Verizon Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Verizon Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Verizon Communications will offset losses from the drop in Verizon Communications' long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and Verizon Communications CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data