Correlation Between Microsoft and Designer Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Designer Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Designer Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Designer Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Designer Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Designer Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Designer Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Designer Brands

0.06
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Designer is 0.06. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Designer Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Designer Brands and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Designer Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Designer Brands has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Designer Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Designer Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.64 times more return on investment than Designer Brands. However, Microsoft is 1.56 times less risky than Designer Brands. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Designer Brands is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  42,375  in Microsoft on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,088) from holding Microsoft or give up 2.57% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Designer Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Microsoft has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Designer Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Designer Brands has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental drivers remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.

Microsoft and Designer Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Designer Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Designer Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Designer Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will offset losses from the drop in Designer Brands' long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Designer Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account