Correlation Between Microsoft and ECD Automotive

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and ECD Automotive at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and ECD Automotive into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and ECD Automotive Design, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and ECD Automotive and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of ECD Automotive. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and ECD Automotive.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and ECD Automotive

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and ECD is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and ECD Automotive Design in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ECD Automotive Design and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with ECD Automotive. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ECD Automotive Design has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and ECD Automotive go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and ECD Automotive

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.25 times more return on investment than ECD Automotive. However, Microsoft is 4.04 times less risky than ECD Automotive. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ECD Automotive Design is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  24,616  in Microsoft on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17,084  from holding Microsoft or generate 69.4% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.4%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  ECD Automotive Design

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
ECD Automotive Design 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ECD Automotive Design has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.

Microsoft and ECD Automotive Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and ECD Automotive

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and ECD Automotive positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, ECD Automotive can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ECD Automotive will offset losses from the drop in ECD Automotive's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and ECD Automotive Design pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum