Correlation Between Microsoft and Global Wholehealth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Global Wholehealth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Global Wholehealth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Global Wholehealth Partners, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Global Wholehealth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Global Wholehealth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Global Wholehealth.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Global Wholehealth

-0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Global is -0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Global Wholehealth Partners in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Wholehealth and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Global Wholehealth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Wholehealth has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Global Wholehealth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Global Wholehealth

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 81.98 times less return on investment than Global Wholehealth. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Microsoft is 57.35 times less risky than Global Wholehealth. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global Wholehealth Partners is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.01  in Global Wholehealth Partners on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Global Wholehealth Partners or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy85.15%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Global Wholehealth Partners

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Global Wholehealth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Over the last 90 days Global Wholehealth Partners has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively weak technical indicators, Global Wholehealth reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Microsoft and Global Wholehealth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Global Wholehealth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Global Wholehealth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Global Wholehealth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Wholehealth will offset losses from the drop in Global Wholehealth's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Global Wholehealth Partners pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets