Correlation Between Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Aggressive Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced

0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Aggressive is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aggressive Balanced and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Aggressive Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aggressive Balanced has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.67 times less return on investment than Aggressive Balanced. In addition to that, Microsoft is 1.92 times more volatile than Aggressive Balanced Allocation. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Aggressive Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,022  in Aggressive Balanced Allocation on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  225.00  from holding Aggressive Balanced Allocation or generate 22.02% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Aggressive Balanced Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Aggressive Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Aggressive Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Aggressive Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aggressive Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Aggressive Balanced's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Aggressive Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators