Correlation Between Microsoft and GLENLN
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and GLENLN 4 27 MAR 27, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and GLENLN and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of GLENLN. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and GLENLN.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and GLENLN
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and GLENLN is 0.11. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and GLENLN 4 27 MAR 27 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GLENLN 4 27 and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with GLENLN. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GLENLN 4 27 has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and GLENLN go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and GLENLN
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.7 times more return on investment than GLENLN. However, Microsoft is 1.7 times more volatile than GLENLN 4 27 MAR 27. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GLENLN 4 27 MAR 27 is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest 40,955 in Microsoft on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,391 from holding Microsoft or generate 3.4% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 85.71% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. GLENLN 4 27 MAR 27
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Microsoft |
| GLENLN 4 27 |
Microsoft and GLENLN Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and GLENLN
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and GLENLN positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, GLENLN can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GLENLN will offset losses from the drop in GLENLN's long position.| Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
| GLENLN vs. Chemours Co | GLENLN vs. Sensient Technologies | GLENLN vs. Western Acquisition Ventures | GLENLN vs. Griffon |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Crypto Correlations module to use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins.
Other Complementary Tools
| Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets |