Correlation Between Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Nebraska Municipal Fund and Mfs Maryland Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Nebraska Municipal with a short position of Mfs Maryland. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland.

Diversification Opportunities for Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between NEBRASKA and Mfs is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Nebraska Municipal Fund and Mfs Maryland Municipal in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Maryland Municipal and Nebraska Municipal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Nebraska Municipal Fund are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Maryland. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Maryland Municipal has no effect on the direction of Nebraska Municipal i.e., Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland

Assuming the 90 days horizon Nebraska Municipal is expected to generate 1.48 times less return on investment than Mfs Maryland. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Nebraska Municipal Fund is 1.07 times less risky than Mfs Maryland. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Maryland Municipal is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  948.00  in Mfs Maryland Municipal on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  65.00  from holding Mfs Maryland Municipal or generate 6.86% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Nebraska Municipal Fund  vs.  Mfs Maryland Municipal

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Nebraska Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nebraska Municipal Fund are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Nebraska Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Maryland Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Maryland Municipal are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Mfs Maryland is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland

The main advantage of trading using opposite Nebraska Municipal and Mfs Maryland positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Nebraska Municipal position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Maryland can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Maryland will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Maryland's long position.
The idea behind Nebraska Municipal Fund and Mfs Maryland Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes