Correlation Between Procter Gamble and New Pacific

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and New Pacific at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and New Pacific into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and New Pacific Metals, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and New Pacific and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of New Pacific. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and New Pacific.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and New Pacific

-0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and New is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and New Pacific Metals in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on New Pacific Metals and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with New Pacific. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of New Pacific Metals has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and New Pacific go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and New Pacific

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.31 times more return on investment than New Pacific. However, Procter Gamble is 3.22 times less risky than New Pacific. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. New Pacific Metals is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  16,930  in Procter Gamble on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  809.00  from holding Procter Gamble or generate 4.78% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  New Pacific Metals

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
New Pacific Metals 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in New Pacific Metals are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively conflicting basic indicators, New Pacific may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Procter Gamble and New Pacific Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and New Pacific

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and New Pacific positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, New Pacific can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in New Pacific will offset losses from the drop in New Pacific's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble and New Pacific Metals pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges