Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Total Transport

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Total Transport at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Total Transport into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble Health and Total Transport Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Total Transport and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Total Transport. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Total Transport.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Total Transport

-0.01
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Total is -0.01. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble Health and Total Transport Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Total Transport Systems and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble Health are associated (or correlated) with Total Transport. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Total Transport Systems has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Total Transport go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Total Transport

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Procter Gamble Health is expected to generate 0.6 times more return on investment than Total Transport. However, Procter Gamble Health is 1.68 times less risky than Total Transport. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Total Transport Systems is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  533,614  in Procter Gamble Health on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  26,386  from holding Procter Gamble Health or generate 4.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble Health  vs.  Total Transport Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble Health are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Procter Gamble may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Total Transport Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Total Transport Systems has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Procter Gamble and Total Transport Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Total Transport

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Total Transport positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Total Transport can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Total Transport will offset losses from the drop in Total Transport's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble Health and Total Transport Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing