Correlation Between Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pine Cliff Energy and Obsidian Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pine Cliff with a short position of Obsidian Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy

0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Pine and Obsidian is 0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pine Cliff Energy and Obsidian Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Obsidian Energy and Pine Cliff is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pine Cliff Energy are associated (or correlated) with Obsidian Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Obsidian Energy has no effect on the direction of Pine Cliff i.e., Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Pine Cliff Energy is expected to generate 1.05 times more return on investment than Obsidian Energy. However, Pine Cliff is 1.05 times more volatile than Obsidian Energy. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Obsidian Energy is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  85.00  in Pine Cliff Energy on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3.00  from holding Pine Cliff Energy or generate 3.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pine Cliff Energy  vs.  Obsidian Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pine Cliff Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Pine Cliff Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, Pine Cliff is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Obsidian Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Obsidian Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, Obsidian Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pine Cliff and Obsidian Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pine Cliff position performs unexpectedly, Obsidian Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Obsidian Energy will offset losses from the drop in Obsidian Energy's long position.
The idea behind Pine Cliff Energy and Obsidian Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas