Correlation Between Retailing Fund and Financial Services

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Retailing Fund and Financial Services at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Retailing Fund and Financial Services into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Retailing Fund Investor and Financial Services Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Retailing Fund and Financial Services and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Retailing Fund with a short position of Financial Services. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Retailing Fund and Financial Services.

Diversification Opportunities for Retailing Fund and Financial Services

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Retailing and Financial is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Retailing Fund Investor and Financial Services Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Financial Services and Retailing Fund is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Retailing Fund Investor are associated (or correlated) with Financial Services. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Financial Services has no effect on the direction of Retailing Fund i.e., Retailing Fund and Financial Services go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Retailing Fund and Financial Services

Assuming the 90 days horizon Retailing Fund is expected to generate 1.35 times less return on investment than Financial Services. In addition to that, Retailing Fund is 1.04 times more volatile than Financial Services Fund. It trades about 0.06 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Financial Services Fund is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  6,984  in Financial Services Fund on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,456  from holding Financial Services Fund or generate 49.48% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Retailing Fund Investor  vs.  Financial Services Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Retailing Fund Investor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Retailing Fund Investor are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Retailing Fund may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Financial Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Financial Services Fund are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Financial Services showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Retailing Fund and Financial Services Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Retailing Fund and Financial Services

The main advantage of trading using opposite Retailing Fund and Financial Services positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Retailing Fund position performs unexpectedly, Financial Services can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Financial Services will offset losses from the drop in Financial Services' long position.
The idea behind Retailing Fund Investor and Financial Services Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules