Correlation Between Energy Services and Banking Fund

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energy Services and Banking Fund at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energy Services and Banking Fund into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energy Services Fund and Banking Fund Investor, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energy Services and Banking Fund and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energy Services with a short position of Banking Fund. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energy Services and Banking Fund.

Diversification Opportunities for Energy Services and Banking Fund

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energy and Banking is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energy Services Fund and Banking Fund Investor in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Banking Fund Investor and Energy Services is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energy Services Fund are associated (or correlated) with Banking Fund. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Banking Fund Investor has no effect on the direction of Energy Services i.e., Energy Services and Banking Fund go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energy Services and Banking Fund

Assuming the 90 days horizon Energy Services Fund is expected to generate 0.94 times more return on investment than Banking Fund. However, Energy Services Fund is 1.06 times less risky than Banking Fund. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Banking Fund Investor is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  22,290  in Energy Services Fund on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,701  from holding Energy Services Fund or generate 12.12% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energy Services Fund  vs.  Banking Fund Investor

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energy Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Services Fund are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Energy Services is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Banking Fund Investor 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Banking Fund Investor are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Banking Fund showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Energy Services and Banking Fund Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energy Services and Banking Fund

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energy Services and Banking Fund positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energy Services position performs unexpectedly, Banking Fund can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Banking Fund will offset losses from the drop in Banking Fund's long position.
The idea behind Energy Services Fund and Banking Fund Investor pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency