Correlation Between Seaboard and White Mountains

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Seaboard and White Mountains at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Seaboard and White Mountains into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Seaboard and White Mountains Insurance, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Seaboard and White Mountains and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Seaboard with a short position of White Mountains. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Seaboard and White Mountains.

Diversification Opportunities for Seaboard and White Mountains

-0.76
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Seaboard and White is -0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Seaboard and White Mountains Insurance in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on White Mountains Insurance and Seaboard is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Seaboard are associated (or correlated) with White Mountains. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of White Mountains Insurance has no effect on the direction of Seaboard i.e., Seaboard and White Mountains go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Seaboard and White Mountains

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Seaboard is expected to under-perform the White Mountains. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Seaboard is 1.12 times less risky than White Mountains. The stock trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The White Mountains Insurance is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  146,089  in White Mountains Insurance on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  52,745  from holding White Mountains Insurance or generate 36.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Seaboard  vs.  White Mountains Insurance

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Seaboard 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Seaboard has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain somewhat strong which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the company investors.
White Mountains Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in White Mountains Insurance are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very conflicting basic indicators, White Mountains may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Seaboard and White Mountains Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Seaboard and White Mountains

The main advantage of trading using opposite Seaboard and White Mountains positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Seaboard position performs unexpectedly, White Mountains can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in White Mountains will offset losses from the drop in White Mountains' long position.
The idea behind Seaboard and White Mountains Insurance pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world