Correlation Between 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in 1933 Industries with a short position of China Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure.

Diversification Opportunities for 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure

0.22
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between 1933 and China is 0.22. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure Construct in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Infrastructure and 1933 Industries is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on 1933 Industries are associated (or correlated) with China Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of 1933 Industries i.e., 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure

Assuming the 90 days horizon 1933 Industries is expected to generate 1.14 times more return on investment than China Infrastructure. However, 1933 Industries is 1.14 times more volatile than China Infrastructure Construction. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Infrastructure Construction is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1.40  in 1933 Industries on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.02) from holding 1933 Industries or give up 72.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy31.99%
ValuesDaily Returns

1933 Industries  vs.  China Infrastructure Construct

 Performance 
       Timeline  
1933 Industries 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days 1933 Industries has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, 1933 Industries is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
China Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Infrastructure Construction has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound basic indicators, China Infrastructure is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

1933 Industries and China Infrastructure Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure

The main advantage of trading using opposite 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if 1933 Industries position performs unexpectedly, China Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in China Infrastructure's long position.
The idea behind 1933 Industries and China Infrastructure Construction pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets