Correlation Between Ambrus Core and New World
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ambrus Core and New World at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ambrus Core and New World into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ambrus Core Bond and New World Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ambrus Core and New World and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ambrus Core with a short position of New World. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ambrus Core and New World.
Diversification Opportunities for Ambrus Core and New World
0.23 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between Ambrus and New is 0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ambrus Core Bond and New World Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on New World Fund and Ambrus Core is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ambrus Core Bond are associated (or correlated) with New World. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of New World Fund has no effect on the direction of Ambrus Core i.e., Ambrus Core and New World go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ambrus Core and New World
Assuming the 90 days horizon Ambrus Core is expected to generate 2.28 times less return on investment than New World. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Ambrus Core Bond is 2.92 times less risky than New World. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. New World Fund is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 6,633 in New World Fund on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,515 from holding New World Fund or generate 22.84% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Very Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Ambrus Core Bond vs. New World Fund
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Ambrus Core Bond |
| New World Fund |
Ambrus Core and New World Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Ambrus Core and New World
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ambrus Core and New World positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ambrus Core position performs unexpectedly, New World can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in New World will offset losses from the drop in New World's long position.| Ambrus Core vs. Virtus High Yield | Ambrus Core vs. Pgim High Yield | Ambrus Core vs. Pioneer High Yield | Ambrus Core vs. Alpine High Yield |
| New World vs. Ambrus Core Bond | New World vs. Dreyfusstandish Global Fixed | New World vs. Gmo High Yield | New World vs. Ab Bond Inflation |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.
Other Complementary Tools
| Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account | |
| Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |